Prepare & Win · Prepare → Review → Budget

Write a winning application, faster.

One calm cockpit shows where every grant stands, what to do next, and exactly what a reviewer would flag — so you fix it before they ever see it.

Built for principal investigators, grant writers & research administrators

Access the beta →See how it works
GrantPathSynaptic Resilience · R01 · NIH
Your next best move
Draft Specific Aims first
Start →
40
Win readiness
100
Opportunity fit
40
Eligibility
0
Narrative
50
Submission
100
Deadline runway
Stage 02Every application starts halfway done — built on the fit scores and eligibility work from Discover. As you strengthen it here, your readiness flows straight into a clean submission.
Doing it by hand

Writing in a dozen open tabs, you never quite know if it’s good enough.

The NOFO in one window, the budget in a spreadsheet, the narrative in a doc, feedback buried in email. Nothing tells you where you stand or what matters most — until a reviewer does, when it’s too late.

Scattered work
Narrative, budget, and feedback in five different places.
No sense of readiness
Is this strong enough to submit? Nobody can say.
Late feedback
The critique that mattered arrives after the deadline.
GrantPathSynaptic Resilience · R01 · NIH
AI review · SignificanceWeakness
“The significance section asserts impact but does not quantify the affected population or cite prevalence data — a reviewer will mark this down.”
Create taskApply rewriteMark resolved
Win readiness +18 since last review
02 · Prepare & Win

Know your readiness, your next move, your weak spots.

Seven live win signals, one dominant next-best action, and a reviewer-style AI critique grounded in this exact NOFO. Every finding becomes a fixable task, and your readiness climbs as you resolve them.

The command center: Seven live win signals and one clear next-best move — the whole grant on a single screen, never a blank page.
Reviewer-style AI critique: A study-section review grounded in this exact NOFO. Each weakness cites its source and turns into a one-click task.
A budget that won’t break a cap: Deterministic checks for indirect-cost math, MTDC exclusions, and program caps — flagged against the funding notice.
Inside the capability

Everything you need to build a winner

The command center

Seven win signals, the single next-best move, plus open tasks and deadlines — the whole grant on one screen.

GrantPathSynaptic Resilience · R01 · NIH
Your next best move
Draft Specific Aims first
Start →
40
Win readiness
100
Opportunity fit
40
Eligibility
0
Narrative
50
Submission
100
Deadline runway
GrantPathSynaptic Resilience · R01 · NIH
AI review · SignificanceWeakness
“The significance section asserts impact but does not quantify the affected population or cite prevalence data — a reviewer will mark this down.”
Create taskApply rewriteMark resolved
Win readiness +18 since last review
Reviewer-style AI critique

A study-section-style review grounded in this NOFO. Each weakness cites its source and turns into a one-click task.

A budget that won’t break a cap

Inline budget lines with deterministic checks — indirect-cost math, MTDC exclusions, and cap warnings flagged against the NOFO.

GrantPathSynaptic Resilience · R01 · NIH
Budget · Year 1$393,600
Personnel$245,000
Equipment$58,000
Travel$12,400
Indirect (F&A)$78,200
Indirect rate verifiedCap: verify vs NOFO
The AI review caught a weak Significance section a reviewer absolutely would have flagged. We fixed it the week before the deadline.
MB
Marcus Bell
Grant Writer · Academic Medical Center
+18
win-readiness lift after a review
Days
earlier on critical fixes

Explore the rest of the platform

Help build GrantPath. Get early access free.

Test it on a real grant and tell us what works. Limited beta spots.

Access the beta →